Legal Opinion

Simpson v. New York Rubber Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 27, 1894PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from circuit court, Dutchess county. Action by George L. Simpson against the New York Rubber Company to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff while engaged at work in defendant’s factory. From a judgment entered on a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $5,000, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial, defendant appeals. Affirmed.

1Opinion of the CourtCullen, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff,, entered upon the verdict of a jury. The action is to recover damages for personal injuries. The plaintiff was in the employ of the defendant, and had worked in its factory for some two years before the occurrence of the accident. On the occasion of that accident, while moving a truck, he slipped and fell, and his hand and arm *340were caught in some cog gearing, and so injured as to necessitate partial amputation. The action is based upon the statute requiring cogs, gearing, etc., to be properly guarded (Laws 1892, c. 673). The questions of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Budd v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Matter of of N.Y., L. W.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1885
  3. People v. . BuddNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  4. Sweeney v. . Berlin and Jones Envelope Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
  5. Sentenis v. . LadewNew York Court of Appeals · 1893

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Johnston v. . FargoNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
  2. Monteith v. Kokomo Wood Enameling Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Fitzwater v. . WarrenNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  4. Shohoney v. Quincy, Omaha & Kansas City RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1910
  5. Curtis & Gartside Co. v. PribylSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API