Legal Opinion
Williamsburg City Fire Insurance v. Lichtenstein
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 15, 1916PublishedCited by 8 opinions
Demurrer to reply.
1Opinion of the CourtDelehanty, J.
This action was brought to foreclose a mortgage upon the premises owned by the defendants Lichtenstein. The latter have interposed answers denying the material allegations of the complaint, and setting up two affirmative defenses and a counterclaim. The' first of these defenses, briefly stated, is to the effect that the parties hereto entered into an agreement whereby payment of the bond and mortgage sued upon was extended until February, 1921, and that this action is prematurely brought. The second is that there has been such part performance of the agreement by the parties that it would be…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Wheeler v. . ReynoldsNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Wahl v. . BarnumNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Cooley v. . LobdellNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- Kent v. . KentNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Galvin v. . PrenticeNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sherman v. HainesOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Deutsch v. Textile Waste Merchandising Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
- Williamsburg City Fire Insurance v. LichtensteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
- Kelley v. Champlain Studios, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928
- Sophie v. FordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.