Legal Opinion

United States v. Undetermined Quantities of Articles of Drug

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided June 12, 2001No. Civ. A. AW-00-1687PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

WILLIAMS, District Judge.

Currently pending before the Court are Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment [19-1] and Defendant Perry Hitt’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [22-1], The motions have been fully briefed by all parties. No hearing is deemed necessary. See Local Rule 105.6. Upon consideration of the arguments made in support of, and opposition to, the respective motions, the Court makes the following determinations.

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Hit Products, Inc., Riverdale Organics, and Dreamworlds (collectively “Defendants”) manufacture, market, and distribute certain…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. CoStar Realty Information, Inc. v. MeissnerDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2009
  2. Neuralstem, Inc. v. StemCells, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2008
  3. United States v. Blue Ribbon Smoked Fish, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2001
  4. United States v. Lane Labs-USA, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2004
  5. T-UP, Inc. v. Consumer Protection DivisionCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API