Legal Opinion
United States v. Lane Labs-USA, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided July 9, 2004No. CIV. 99-5782(WGB)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BASSLER, District Judge.
The central issue in this case is whether plaintiff United States of America (“the Government” or “Plaintiff’) is entitled to a permanent injunction prohibiting defendants Lane Labs-USA, Inc. and Andrew J. Lane (collectively “Defendants”) from marketing certain products — one made from shark cartilage, one from rice bran treated with Shiitake mushroom, and one from glycoalkaloid, which is an extract of sand brier — as treatments for cancer, skin cancer, and HTV/AIDS.
This matter comes before the Court on the Government’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. Lane Labs-USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- George S. Thanos v. District of Columbia and District of Columbia v. George S. ThanosDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- United States v. Organic Pastures Dairy CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010
- KELK v. BAUSCH HEALTH COMPANIES INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2025
- Regina Pellegrino, Jeana Anastasi, and Zacharie Happel, on behalf of themselves, all others similarly situated, and the general public v. The Procter & Gamble Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2026
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.