Legal Opinion
T-UP, Inc. v. Consumer Protection Division
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Decided June 26, 2002No. 0064, Sept. Term, 2001PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RODOWSKY, Judge,
Retired, Specially Assigned.
This is an action for judicial review of an order by the Consumer Protection Division of the Office of the Attorney General (the Agency). The appellants are Neal Deoul (Deoul), Allen Hoffman (Hoffman), and T-UP, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the Company). The Agency found that the appellants had violated the Consumer Protection Act (the Act), Maryland Code (1975, 2000 Repl.Vol.), Title 13 of the Commercial Law Article (CL), by falsely advertising two products sold by the Company as cures or treatments for, inter alia, cancer, AIDS, and HIV. Only the…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- United Parcel Service, Inc. v. People's CounselCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Board of Physician Quality Assurance v. BanksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- Reed v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Allen v. DackmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- MARYCLE, LLC. v. First Choice Internet, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Department of Public Safety & Correctional Services v. NealCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- Allen v. DackmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- In the Matter of Cash-N-GoCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.