Legal Opinion

Carras v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 21, 1995No. 13292-7-IIIPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sweeney, A.C.J.

Randolph H. Carras sued Linda Louise Johnson and Edith and Woodrow Walker1 for injuries sustained in a car accident. After attempting personal service on Johnson and the Walkers, Carras substituted service on the Secretary of State. The trial court granted Johnson’s and the Walkers’ motion for summary judgment and dismissed the action. Carras appeals. The dispositive issue is whether Carras’ efforts to serve Johnson and the Walkers satisfied the due diligence requirement of the substituted service statute, RCW 46.64.040, as a matter of law. We conclude that he did and reverse.

Fa…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Martin v. MeierWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Martin v. TriolWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Parkash v. PerryCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Huff v. BudbillWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Harvey v. ObermeitCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  3. Boes v. BisiarCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  4. Boes v. BisiarCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  5. Keithly v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API