Legal Opinion

Boes v. Bisiar

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 13, 2004No. 21827-9-IIIPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

94 P.3d 975 (2004)

Shirley M. BOES, Appellant,

v.

Eric BISIAR and Jane Doe Bisiar, husband and wife, Respondents.

No. 21827-9-III.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, Panel Nine.

July 13, 2004.

Stephen L. Nordstrom, Attorney at Law, Spokane, WA, for Appellant.

Steven R. Stocker, Matthew T. Ries, Attorneys at Law, Spokane, WA, for Respondent.

SWEENEY, J.

Service by publication first requires a diligent effort to serve and then some showing that the defendant is trying to avoid service. RCW 4.28.100(2). Our disposition here turns on the sufficiency of the plaintiff's showing that the defendant…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Skimming v. BoxerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  2. Skimming v. BoxerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  3. Jones v. StebbinsWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Dobbins v. MendozaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
  5. Dobbins v. MendozaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Rodriguez v. James-JacksonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  2. Rodriguez v. James-JacksonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  3. Elizabeth Cito v. Jennifer K. Rios And John Doe RiosCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
  4. Candea Balcom v. Tamara Bland, et anoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
  5. Dodo International Inc v. ParkerDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2021

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API