Legal Opinion

Boes v. Bisiar

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 13, 2004No. 21827-9-IIIPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.

Service by publication first requires a diligent effort to serve and then some showing that the defendant is trying to avoid service. RCW 4.28.100(2). Our disposition here turns on the sufficiency of the plaintiff’s showing that the defendant attempted to avoid service. We conclude that leaving the state for the final 10 days of the service period raises a sufficient inference of an attempt to avoid service of process. And we reverse the trial court’s holding to the contrary.

*572FACTS

Eric Bisiar drove his car into Shirley Boes’ car and injured her on July 12, 1999. Ms. Boes hired a lawyer,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Skimming v. BoxerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  2. Skimming v. BoxerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  3. Jones v. StebbinsWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Dobbins v. MendozaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
  5. Dobbins v. MendozaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Rodriguez v. James-JacksonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  2. Rodriguez v. James-JacksonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  3. Elizabeth Cito v. Jennifer K. Rios And John Doe RiosCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
  4. Amana Global Company v. King CountyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2023
  5. BBC Chartering Carriers GMBH & Co. KG v. Dmitry FarberDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2025

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API