Legal Opinion

Keithly v. Sanders

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 17, 2012No. 67064-6-IPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.

¶1 Todd Keithly appeals the trial court’s summary dismissal with prejudice of this action. He argues that he complied with the requirements of RCW 46.64.040, the nonresident motorist act, before expiration of the statute of limitations. We hold that he did not. Keithly failed to send “forthwith” notice of the service of the secretary of state by registered mail to Benjamin Sanders at his last known address before the expiration of the statute of limitations. Thus, service under RCW 46.64.040 was ineffective. Accordingly, we affirm the dismissal.

¶2 Sanders and Keithly were in a car accident in…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. State v. McFarlandWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Grannis v. OrdeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. Young v. Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
  5. State v. J.P.Washington Supreme Court · 2003

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Heinzig v. Seok HwangCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  2. Arthur Davis, App. v. Laura Blumenstein And Jean Doe Blumenstein, Res.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  3. Larson v. Kyungsik YoonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  4. Corinn James And Ian James v. Casey McmurryCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  5. Cynthia Larson, Et Vir. v. Kyungsik Yoon, Et UxCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API