Legal Opinion
Young v. Three for One Oil Royalties
California Supreme Court
Decided October 11, 1934No. L. A. 12648PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.
The facts of this case are adequately and correctly stated in our former opinion (Cal.) [31 Pac. (2d) 789] as follows:
“The appeal is from a judgment in favor of the defendants in an action brought to recover the amounts paid for certain certificates of beneficial interests in a common-law trust, it being the theory of the complaint that the sales of the interests were in violation of the Corporate Securities Act, and that defendants had falsely and fraudulently represented that they had secured a permit from the corporation commissioner to sell the certificates and had fully complied with the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In Re Application of FlesherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
3Cited by29 opinions
- Blatty v. New York Times Co.California Supreme Court · 1986
- Clements v. T. R. Bechtel Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
- Mary Pickford Co. v. Bayly Bros., Inc.California Supreme Court · 1939
- Trafton v. YoungbloodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Estate of ToddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.