Legal Opinion

Holyoke Water Power Co. v. American Writing Paper Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 1, 1937No. 180PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cardozo

The controversy is one as to the number of dollars in present currency that will discharge a covenant for rent in leases antedating the reduction of the gold content of the dollar, the covenant being phrased in the manner hereinafter stated.

At various times between 1881 and 1897 thirteen leases were executed by the Holyoke Water Company, the petitioner, to the American Writing Paper Company, Inc., the respondent, for the enjoyment in perpetuity of waterpower rights and privileges in consideration of an annual rental. With variations immaterial for present purposes, the provision for rental is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Norman v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Perry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Purity Extract & Tonic Co. v. LynchSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. Lipke v. LedererSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  5. Nortz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Guaranty Trust Co. v. HenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. New York Trust Co. v. Securities & Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
  3. Henderson v. Mann Theatres Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. Fay Corp. v. Bat Holdings I, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1986
  5. Schagun v. Scott Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API