Legal Opinion
A.S. v. Pennsylvania State Police
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 7, 2014PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
President Judge PELLEGRINI 1.
Before the Court are the cross-motions for summary judgment of A.S. and the Pennsylvania State Police (PSP) filed pursuant to Pa. R.C.P. No. 1035.22 with respect to A.S.’s Petition for Review in the Nature of a Complaint in Mandamus (Petition) 3 seeking to compel PSP to change his sexual offender registration status under the former Section 9795.1 of the Sentencing Code, 42 Pa.C.S. § 9795.1,4 from a lifetime registrant to a ten-year registrant. For the reasons that follow, we grant A.S.’s cross-motion for summary relief and the mandamus relief sought in…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Moore v. New York Cotton ExchangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Commonwealth v. HudeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. McClinticSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- A.S. v. Pennsylvania State PoliceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Coppolino v. NoonanCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth v. Lutz-Morrison, T., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- State v. CarrSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
- A.S. v. Pennsylvania State PoliceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.