Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. McClintic

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 22, 2006No. 37 EAP 2005PublishedCited by 122 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice BAER.

This Court granted review of the order of the Superior Court affirming Appellant’s judgment of sentence to consider whether, under the Sentencing Code’s Three Strikes Law, Appellant should have been subject to a sentence enhancement for each crime of violence committed during a single criminal episode. See 42 Pa.C.S. § 9714(a)(2). For the follow*468ing reasons, we answer this question in the negative, and thus vacate the order of the Superior Court and remand to the trial court for re-sentencing consistent with this opinion.

The facts underlying this case are not in dispute.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MouzonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Commonwealth v. ShifflerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Commonwealth v. Gilmour Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Ramich v. Worker's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. Commonwealth v. BradleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by122 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Batts, Q., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. Commonwealth v. CoxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. A.S. v. Pennsylvania State PoliceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. Commonwealth v. ProvenzanoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  5. Commonwealth v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011

117 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API