Legal Opinion
Garland v. Roy
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided August 6, 2009No. Docket: Han-08-467PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtClifford, J.
[¶ 1] Paul F. and Angeline A. Garland appeal from a judgment entered in the Superior Court (Hancock County, Cuddy, J.) following a jury verdict on their claim for professional negligence against attorney Peter R. Roy and the law firm of Roy, Beardsley, Williams & Granger, LLC (collectively, Roy). The Garlands contend, inter alia, that the court erred by entering a judgment as a matter of law against them on their claim for the value of their lost property. Roy cross-appeals, contending that there was insufficient evidence of any legal malpractice, and that emotional distress damages were…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Maere v. ChurchillAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
- Corey v. Norman, Hanson & DeTroySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
- Lawrence v. GrindeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
- Rubin v. Matthews International Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986
- Lickteig v. Alderson, Ondov, Leonard & Sween, P.A.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Miranda v. SaidSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
- Vincent v. DeVriesSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
- Kurtz & Perry, P.A. v. EmersonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
- Ma v. BryanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
- Santina Caruso v. The Jackson LaboratorySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.