Legal Opinion

Vincent v. DeVries

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 24, 2013No. 2012-026PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

¶ 1. This ease involves a jury award of emotional distress and economic damages in a legal malpractice action. Defendant challenges the damages award on the grounds that emotional distress damages are not available in a legal malpractice case and that the award of economic damages equal to the amount plaintiff paid to settle the underlying case was improper because plaintiff failed to establish that the underlying settlement was reasonable. We reverse as to the award of emotional distress damages and affirm as to the economic damages award.

¶ 2. The facts of the underlying case that gave rise…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Molien v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Christensen v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Johnson v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Hedgepeth v. Whitman Walker ClinicDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Douglas v. DelpTexas Supreme Court · 1999

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Miranda v. SaidSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
  2. Magner v. BrinkmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Schmidt v. CooganWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Foti Fuels, Inc. v. Kurrle Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2013
  5. Jennifer Zeno-Ethridge and Dennis Ethridge v. Comcast CorporationSupreme Court of Vermont · 2024

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API