Legal Opinion
Maere v. Churchill
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided July 27, 1983No. 82-245PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Alloy
The plaintiffs Francis Maere and Joann Maere, husband and wife, appeal from judgments of the circuit court in their action against defendants Cyrus Churchill and Daniel Churchill, individually and as partners in the law firm of Churchill & Churchill. The Maere’s action was brought against the Churchills to recover damages caused by an alleged breach of an oral contract to provide legal services and by alleged negligence in the performance of services to the Maeres in a real estate purchase transaction. The circuit court, on defense motion to strike, ruled that the Maeres could not recover, in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Rickey v. Chicago Transit AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
- Braun v. CravenIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
- Kelly v. Chicago Park DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 1951
- Dolan v. HudsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
- State Ex Rel. Dresskell v. City of MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1943
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Kwan v. Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1994
- Henry H. Stafford, Jr. v. Louis Puro, Robert D. Levin and Seena Puro, Co-Executors of the Estate of Arthur Puro, DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Lawrence v. GrindeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
- Harrison v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1989
- Miranda v. SaidSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.