Legal Opinion

Kurtz & Perry, P.A. v. Emerson

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided October 26, 2010No. Docket: Oxf-09-577PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.

[¶ 1] This appeal presents the question of whether, and to what extent, a decision by a panel of the Fee Arbitration Commission, pursuant to Maine Bar Rule 9, that is adopted as a judgment of the trial court, may serve as a full or partial bar to a legal malpractice counterclaim asserted in the fee collection action.

[¶ 2] Nancy J. Emerson appeals from a summary judgment entered in the Superi- or Court (Oxford County, Nivison, J.) in favor of the law firm of Kurtz & Perry, P.A., (K & P) and Alan J. Perry on Emerson’s counterclaims and third-party claims for legal malpractice. In granting K & P…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Beal v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
  2. MacOmber v. MacQuinn-TweedieSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
  3. Efstathiou v. EfstathiouSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
  4. Western Industrial & Environmental Services, Inc. v. Kaldveer Associates, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Rainey v. LangenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Flaherty v. MutherSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
  2. Baker v. FarrandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
  3. Wilmington Trust Company v. Karen Anne Sullivan-ThorneSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2013
  4. Bonney v. Stephens Memorial HospitalSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
  5. In re JonasSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API