Kurtz & Perry, P.A. v. Emerson
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.
[¶ 1] This appeal presents the question of whether, and to what extent, a decision by a panel of the Fee Arbitration Commission, pursuant to Maine Bar Rule 9, that is adopted as a judgment of the trial court, may serve as a full or partial bar to a legal malpractice counterclaim asserted in the fee collection action.
[¶ 2] Nancy J. Emerson appeals from a summary judgment entered in the Superi- or Court (Oxford County, Nivison, J.) in favor of the law firm of Kurtz & Perry, P.A., (K & P) and Alan J. Perry on Emerson’s counterclaims and third-party claims for legal malpractice. In granting K & P…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Beal v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
- MacOmber v. MacQuinn-TweedieSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
- Efstathiou v. EfstathiouSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
- Western Industrial & Environmental Services, Inc. v. Kaldveer Associates, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1994
- Rainey v. LangenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Flaherty v. MutherSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
- Baker v. FarrandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
- Wilmington Trust Company v. Karen Anne Sullivan-ThorneSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2013
- Bonney v. Stephens Memorial HospitalSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011
- In re JonasSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.