Legal Opinion

Nielson v. King County

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1967No. 39072PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonworth, J.

This action was instituted by Eugene R. Nielson and his wife against King County and its county engineer to recover $150 damages 1 to their real property (owned by them and on which they reside), allegedly caused by an obstruction to the natural flow of Clough Creek. Plaintiffs Nielson further seek a court order enjoining defendants to remove the unlawful obstruction they maintain in the watercourse as described in the complaint, on the theory that it constitutes a nuisance.

It is alleged in the complaint in paragraphs 2 and 6 as follows:

2. Defendant County unlawfully maintains an obstruction…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Thorndike v. Hesperian Orchards, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Sigman v. Stevens-Norton, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Harkoff v. Whatcom CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  4. King County v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Sander v. WellsWashington Supreme Court · 1967

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Tyler Pipe Industries, Inc. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Holmes Harbor Water Co. v. PageCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973
  3. Rocky Mountain Thrift Stores Inc. v. Salt Lake City Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Lindbrook Construction, Inc. v. Mukilteo School District No. 6Washington Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Calistro v. Spokane Valley Irrigation District No. 10Washington Supreme Court · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API