Nielson v. King County
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDonworth, J.
This action was instituted by Eugene R. Nielson and his wife against King County and its county engineer to recover $150 damages 1 to their real property (owned by them and on which they reside), allegedly caused by an obstruction to the natural flow of Clough Creek. Plaintiffs Nielson further seek a court order enjoining defendants to remove the unlawful obstruction they maintain in the watercourse as described in the complaint, on the theory that it constitutes a nuisance.
It is alleged in the complaint in paragraphs 2 and 6 as follows:
2. Defendant County unlawfully maintains an obstruction…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Thorndike v. Hesperian Orchards, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
- Sigman v. Stevens-Norton, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1967
- Harkoff v. Whatcom CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1952
- King County v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1950
- Sander v. WellsWashington Supreme Court · 1967
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Tyler Pipe Industries, Inc. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- Holmes Harbor Water Co. v. PageCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973
- Rocky Mountain Thrift Stores Inc. v. Salt Lake City Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1994
- Lindbrook Construction, Inc. v. Mukilteo School District No. 6Washington Supreme Court · 1969
- Calistro v. Spokane Valley Irrigation District No. 10Washington Supreme Court · 1970
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.