Lindbrook Construction, Inc. v. Mukilteo School District No. 6
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.
There are on this appeal 10 assignments of *540error; 4 relate to claimed errors in the findings of fact made by the trial court; 5 relate to a failure to make, findings proposed by the defendant-appellant; and 1 relates to the trial court’s conclusion of law No. 2:
That judgment should be entered in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant in the sum of $42,834.20 together with plaintiff’s taxable costs.
The findings of fact give a succinct statement of what the controversy is all about. The plaintiff is a construction company; the defendant is a school district. Findings of fact Nos. 3 to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Thorndike v. Hesperian Orchards, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
- Kaiser Industries Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- Bignold v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1965
- American Sheet Metal Works, Inc. v. HaynesWashington Supreme Court · 1965
- Kieburtz v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1915
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Stender v. Twin City Foods, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1973
- Absher Construction Co. v. Kent School District No. 415Court of Appeals of Washington · 1995
- Johnson v. Harrigan-Peach Land Development Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1971
- Mike M. Johnson, Inc. v. County of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- Mike M. Johnson, Inc. v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2003
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.