Falcon v. Maricopa County
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TIMMER, Judge.
¶ 1 Can a party intending to sue a county satisfy the notiee-of-claim requirement set forth in Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 12-821.01(A) (2003) by sending the requisite notice to one member of the county board of supervisors? We must answer that question to decide this appeal from the entry of summary judgment against Guadalupe Falcon’s surviving children, who sued Maricopa County for medical malpractice after their mother’s death in a county-owned medical facility.
¶2 For the reasons that follow, we hold that an aggrieved party intending to sue a county can…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Andrews v. BlakeArizona Supreme Court · 2003
- Estate of Hernandez v. FlavioArizona Supreme Court · 1997
- Nielson v. PattersonArizona Supreme Court · 2003
- Arizona Department of Revenue v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
- Forino v. Arizona Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Falcon Ex Rel. Sandoval v. Maricopa CountyArizona Supreme Court · 2006
- Lee v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Guadalupe Falcon v. Maricopa CountyArizona Supreme Court · 2006