Legal Opinion

Falcon v. Maricopa County

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 14, 2006No. 1 CA-CV 04-0801PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TIMMER, Judge.

¶ 1 Can a party intending to sue a county satisfy the notiee-of-claim requirement set forth in Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 12-821.01(A) (2003) by sending the requisite notice to one member of the county board of supervisors? We must answer that question to decide this appeal from the entry of summary judgment against Guadalupe Falcon’s surviving children, who sued Maricopa County for medical malpractice after their mother’s death in a county-owned medical facility.

¶2 For the reasons that follow, we hold that an aggrieved party intending to sue a county can…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Andrews v. BlakeArizona Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Estate of Hernandez v. FlavioArizona Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Nielson v. PattersonArizona Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Arizona Department of Revenue v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  5. Forino v. Arizona Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Falcon Ex Rel. Sandoval v. Maricopa CountyArizona Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Lee v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  3. Guadalupe Falcon v. Maricopa CountyArizona Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API