Legal Opinion

Cmelak v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1965PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.

The questions on this appeal arise out of the statutory requirements 3 that must be fulfilled to establish eligibility for workmen’s compensation. In this case we are particularly concerned with the requirements that the employee at the time of the accident “is performing service growing out of and incidental to his employment” and that the “accident . . . arises out of his employment.”

The first requisite, that the employee must be performing service growing out of and incidental to his employment, by statutory definition includes every employee “going to and from his employment in the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cutler-Hammer, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Horvath v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  3. American Motors Corp. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Foster-Latimer Lumber Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Jenson v. Employers Mutual Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Ide v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Walker Manufacturing Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Frisbie v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Briggs & Stratton Corp. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API