Legal Opinion
Ide v. Labor & Industry Review Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided February 26, 1999No. 97-1649PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJon P. Wilcox, J.
¶1. MacFarlane Pheasant Farm, Inc., and its insurer, Rural Mutual Insurance Company (hereinafter "MacFarlane Farm") appeal from an unpublished court of appeals decision reversing a circuit court judgment which upheld the Labor and Industry Review Commission's (LIRC) determination that the injuries sustained by the plaintiff, David S. Ide, were not compensable under the Wisconsin Worker's Compensation Act (WCA). MacFarlane Farm contends that while the court of appeals correctly found that Ide, a previous employee who injured his back while changing the tire on a van he borrowed from MacFarlane…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Nottelson v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Kelley Co., Inc. v. MarquardtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
- Lisney v. LIRCWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
- Nigbor v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- Goranson v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Seider v. O'CONNELLWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
- Racine Harley-Davidson, Inc. v. State Division of Hearings & AppealsWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
- Affordable Erecting, Inc. v. Neosho Trompler, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
- American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. HernandezCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
- Mireles v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.