Legal Opinion

Horvath v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1965PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeilfuss, J.

The principal issue upon this appeal is, as stipulated by the parties before the examiner, did the injury take place in the course of employment and did it arise out of employment within the meaning of the Workmen’s Compensation Act. As a necessary incident to our consideration of the principal issue, we must determine whether the findings of the commission, based upon facts herein, are conclusive.

The court has dealt with this problem on innumerable occasions. The applicable rules derived from the cases can be summarized from the following citations:

“The only question, is whether there is…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Pabst v. Department of TaxationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Gant v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Van Roy v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Schmidlkofer v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Cutler-Hammer, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Fisher v. MayfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. R. T. Madden, Inc. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Heinz v. Concord Union School DistrictSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  4. Walker Manufacturing Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Schwab v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API