Cutler-Hammer, Inc. v. Industrial Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHallows, J.
This appeal presents two questions: (1) Did the applicant sustain an accident causing injury arising out of his employment, and (2) was there a refusal or failure of treatment by the employer ?
Not only is it necessary that the employee at the time of the accident be performing services growing out of and incidental to his employment but the accident causing the injury must arise out of the employment. Sec. 102.03 (1) (c) and (e), Stats.; Nash-Kelvinator Corp. v. Industrial Comm. (1954), 266 Wis. 81, 62 N. W. (2d) 567. There is no question here that the employee at the time of the accident was…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- City of Milwaukee v. MillerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
- Van Roy v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
- American Motors Corp. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
- Beem v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
- Nash-Kelvinator Corp. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Goranson v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Slimfold Mfg. Co. v. MartinCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1981
- Volunteers of America of Madison, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Brenne v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- Bruns Volkswagen, Inc. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1982
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.