Legal Opinion

Jordan v. Bailey

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided August 28, 1997No. 28167PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This case arises from a neighborhood dispute regarding water rights. Appellant, Victor Jordan (“Jordan”), filed criminal trespass charges against Respondent, Stanley Bailey (“Bailey”), after Bailey crossed Jordan’s property to perform work on an aqueduct system which services certain water rights along the Ophir Creek near Washoe Valley, Nevada. After being found not guilty in a local justice court, Bailey commenced this action in district court for malicious prosecution. Jordan counterclaimed, seeking injunctive and declaratory relief in connection with his claim that Bailey had no…

3Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Sheldon Appel Co. v. Albert & OlikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Hermann v. Varco-Pruden BuildingsNevada Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Chapman v. City of RenoNevada Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Dutt v. KrempNevada Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Nelson v. Peckham Plaza PartnershipsNevada Supreme Court · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by11 opinions

  1. LaMantia v. RedisiNevada Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Horgan v. FeltonNevada Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Jones v. GhadiriNevada Supreme Court · 2024
  4. Aziz v. Eldorado Resorts, LLCDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2014
  5. Dias v. EliqueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API