Legal Opinion

Levine v. Katz

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1940No. Docket No. 111, Calendar No. 40,613PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.

This is a suit in assumpsit on a bond secured by a trust mortgage. The facts are before us by stipulation of counsel. Defendant executed a mortgage on property in the city of Detroit to the Guaranty Trust Company of Detroit, Michigan, as trustee, to secure an issue of bonds payable to the Guaranty Trust Company, Detroit, trustee, or bearer; or if the bond be registered, then to the registered owner. The agreemeiits and conditions printed on the bond showed that it was sold and guaranteed against loss by the Guaranty Investment Company. On the back of the bond was an indorsement to the effect…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. In Re Fowle's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Feldman v. PrestonMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Wineman v. FisherMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Bankers Trust Co. v. ForsythMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Calmenson v. MoudrySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Katz v. KowalskyMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  2. May v. AckermanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API