Wineman v. Fisher
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Brooke, J. Assumpsit by Hugo A. Wineman against Frank E. Fisher to enforce defendant’s liability for a labor debt of a corporation in which he was a stockholder. From a judgment for defendant on verdict directed by the court, • plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtCarpenter, J.
Plaintiff brought this suit in justice court. His declaration was “in an action of assumpsit on all the common counts, and specially on a certain judgment rendered by Justice Stein, one of the justices for the city of Detroit, on the 3d day of July, A. D. 1899, in favor of said plaintiff * * * and against the Fisher Electrical *606Manufacturing Company, on a labor debt, for the sum of $251.16, and interest since the date of said judgment. Recovery is sought in this case under section 7065, 2 Comp. Laws 1897, which makes stockholders of a corporation personally liable for labor performed for the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hurtford v. HolmesMichigan Supreme Court · 1855
- Chicago & Northeastern Railroad v. SturgisMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
- Tyrrel v. HammersteinNew York Supreme Court · 1900
- Fisher v. WinemanMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
- Tilden v. YoungMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
3Cited by11 opinions
- Smith v. HillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
- Katz v. KowalskyMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
- Parker v. MurphyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Graber v. GaultAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
- Sloan v. GrollmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1910
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.