Legal Opinion
Feldman v. Preston
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided December 22, 1916No. Docket No. 99PublishedCited by 11 opinions
Certiorari to Presque Isle; Emerick, J. Attachment proceedings by Sam Feldman against Thad B. Preston, individually and ap trustee. From an order denying a motion to quash, defendants bring certiorari.
1Opinion of the CourtSteere, J.
On February 26, 1916, plaintiff, Feldman, a resident of Onaway, Presque Isle county, Mich., began this action by attachment in that county against defendant Preston, who was a resident of Ionia county, Mich.
Plaintiff made an affidavit stating as the grounds and foundation for his writ of attachment:
*355“That Thad B. Preston, trustee, and Thad B. Preston, the defendant named in said writ, is now justly indebted to Sam Feldman, the plaintiff named in said writ, in the sum of $1,500, as near as may be over and above all legal set-offs, and that the same is now due and payable upon contract.
“And this…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hussey v. ArnoldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
- Trask v. GreenMichigan Supreme Court · 1861
- Lothrop v. DuffieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
- Columbia Bank v. JacobsMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
- Gorham v. ArnoldMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Beggs v. FiteTexas Supreme Court · 1937
- Kysor Industrial Corp. v. D. M. Liquidating Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1968
- Allen v. MerrillMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
- Allegheny Tank Car Co. v. CulbertsonDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1923
- Hawthorne v. Austin Organ Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.