State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. Balderas
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.
Appellant, the youth in this juvenile delinquency proceeding, has moved for leave to pursue an otherwise untimely commenced appeal. The motion raises the question of whether the court has jurisdiction in this matter. In particular, should the principle of State ex rel SOSCF v. Hammons, 169 Or App 589, 10 P3d 310 (2000), be extended to a juvenile delinquency proceeding where youth’s counsel failed to file a timely notice of appeal and youth asserts that that failure constituted inadequate assistance of counsel? We conclude that youth is entitled to assert that counsel’s failure to file a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. GeistOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- Far West Landscaping, Inc. v. Pacific Cascade Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
- State Ex Rel. Acocella v. AllenOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- Evans v. Oregon State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
- State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. CharlesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Miller v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- State v. BrewerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- Bergerson v. Salem-Keizer School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
- State v. HikesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- Rodriguez v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.