Legal Opinion
State v. Eibensteiner
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 28, 2004No. A04-792PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WRIGHT, Judge.
The state appeals from a pretrial order dismissing a grand jury indictment that charged respondent with violating laws prohibiting corporate campaign contributions. The state argues that the district court erred in ruling that the case was not properly venued in Mower County and that the evidence was insufficient to establish probable cause to proceed. We reverse and remand.
FACTS
A Mower County grand jury returned an indictment, charging respondent Ronald Eibensteiner with aiding and abetting two violations of Minn.Stat. § 211B.15, subd. 2 (2002), which prohibits both…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- United States v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- State v. CuevasSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
- State v. FlorenceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- State v. SteinbuchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. PierceCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- Minnesota Chamber of Commerce v. GaertnerDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2010
- State v. K.M.M.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. EhmkeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
- Saint Paul Area Chamber of Commerce v. GaertnerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.