Legal Opinion

State v. Ahmed

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided November 21, 2006PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.

[¶ 1] Hussein Ahmed appeals from a judgment of conviction for domestic violence assault (Class D), 17-A M.R.S. §§ 207(1)(A), 1202(1-B) (2005) entered after a non-jury trial before the District Court (Lewiston, Lawrence, /.). Ahmed asserts that the trial court erred by: (1) admitting a police officer’s testimony describing statements made by the victim, Ahmed’s wife, at the time of the event; (2) excluding an audiotape that Ahmed had created from voicemail messages that purportedly contained threats from his wife; (3) excluding a video Ahmed had taken of the victim using his cell phone…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. State v. GormanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2004
  4. State v. BarnesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2004
  5. State v. SmenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2006

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. GouldSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
  2. In Re David H.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
  3. State v. MetzgerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
  4. State of Maine v. Dana WilsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2015
  5. State of Maine v. Richard J. KimballSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2015

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API