State of Maine v. Richard J. Kimball
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.
[¶ 1] In this appeal we address, again, issues that arise when a victim of domestic violence claims lack of memory of critical events or otherwise becomes unavailable or unwilling to testify against the accused. The State, to maintain the prosecution in such cases, often must rely on alternatives to,.first-person testimony to bring the victim’s statements before the jury. The challenges for trial courts addressing such • evidence have been enhanced in recent years by opinions of the United States Supreme Court, beginning with Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 124 S.Ct. 1354, 158 L.Ed.2d…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- State of Tennessee v. Kacy Dewayne CannonTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. MuttartOhio Supreme Court · 2007
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State of Maine v. Joshua LovellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2022
- State v. CooperSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
- State of Maine v. Corydon JudkinsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2024
- State of Maine v. Dwain A. SykesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2019
- State of Maine v. Macie N. JonesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2018
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.