Rochat v. Gee
California Supreme Court
Motion to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Superior Court of San Bernardino County approving a receiver’s account. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtPaterson, J.
This action was commenced by the plaintiff, June 27, 1888, for a dissolution of the copartnership existing between himself and defendant, for the appointment of a receiver, and for an accounting and settlement of the affairs of the partnership, and on that day the respondent Sommer was appointed receiver, “ to take charge of, manage and control, and dispose of, under the direction of this (superior) court, all that certain real property belonging to the copartnership of Rochat & Gee, and to have charge of, manage, control, and dispose of all personal property of the said firm of Rochat & Gee,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- John Perkins v. Edward F. Fourniquet and Wife, and Martin W. Ewing and WifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1848
- Adams v. WoodsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
- Estate of CalahanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- Page v. PageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- McCord, Brady & Co. v. WeilNebraska Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by25 opinions
- Barnes v. BarnesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Title Ins. Trust Co. v. Calif. Etc. Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Grant v. Superior Court of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Brown v. Memorial National Home FoundationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- City of Los Angeles v. Los Angeles City Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.