Legal Opinion

State v. Boyle

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided July 17, 2007No. AC 28157PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BISHOP, J.

The defendant, Kevin M. Boyle, appeals from the modification of the conditions of his probation resulting in the imposition of a special condition that he claims is unrelated to the offense for which he is serving probation. Because there is no nexus between the modified condition and the charge for which the defendant is serving probation, we reverse the judgment of the trial court.

The following factual and procedural history is relevant to the consideration of the defendant’s appeal. On August 24, 2005, the defendant was charged with operating a motor vehicle while under…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. State v. GrahamConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
  3. Pasquariello v. Stop & Shop Companies, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  4. State v. PiegerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  5. State v. MisiorskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. BoyleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  2. State v. CrouchConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  3. State v. BoyleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  4. State v. BoyleConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API