Legal Opinion
State v. Misiorski
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 17, 1999No. SC 15983PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MCDONALD, J.
The sole issue in this appeal is
whether the office of adult probation has authority to provide members of the public with information concerning a probationer guilty of sexual offenses not enumerated in subsection (a) of General Statutes (Rev. to 1997) § 54-102s.1 We hold that it has such authority.
*282The following facts are undisputed. On December 17, 1997, the defendant, Donald Misiorski, pleaded, pursuant to a plea bargain, guilty to sexual assault in the fourth degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-73a, 2 and public indecency in violation of General Stat*283utes §…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Griffin v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Burns v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Nos. 96-5132, 96-5416Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- State v. AmarilloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- State v. KellySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- State v. FaradaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- State v. HillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- State v. FowlkesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- State v. ARTHUR H.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.