Legal Opinion
State v. Pieger
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 29, 1997No. 15546PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KATZ, J.
The sole issue in this certified appeal is whether the Appellate Court properly concluded that the trial court acted within its discretion when, as part of the defendant’s sentence, it imposed as a condition of probation that the defendant make a charitable donation to the hospital where the victim had been treated *641after being struck and seriously injured by the defendant’s motor vehicle. We conclude that the trial court acted within its discretion when it imposed the condition.
The following facts, as found by the trial court following a bench trial, are relevant to our…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Bearden v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- People v. CarbajalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- United States v. Virginia Consuelo-GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- State v. AmarilloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Willow Springs Condominium Ass'n v. Seventh BRT Development Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- State v. KirschSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- State v. HillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- State v. FowlkesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- State v. MisiorskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.