Legal Opinion

Hupf v. State Farm Mutual Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1961PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDieterich, J.

The first issue for this court to consider is whether or not there has been an abuse of discretion by the trial court in granting the second extension of time in which to serve the bill of exceptions. Miller v. Belanger (1957), 275 Wis. 187, 81 N. W. (2d) 545.

One of the attorneys for the defendants recites in his affidavit of June 8, 1960, the following facts in support of his motion for further time in which to serve the bill of exceptions: That the court reporter informed him on March 11, 1960, that she could not complete the transcript by April 4, 1960; April 4, 1960, being the ninetieth…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Behringer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Miller v. BelangerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Fleischhacker v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Kuchenbecker v. MillhiserWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Klanseck v. Anderson Sales & Service, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Strupp v. Farmers Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Bergmann v. Insurance Company of North AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Lehman v. Sentry InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Munger v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1966

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API