Strupp v. Farmers Mutual Automobile Insurance
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.
1. Defective verdict. The verdict was defective as to the essential liability questions. Ten jurors agreed that both drivers were causally negligent, but only nine of those 10 agreed on the comparison. “. . . If more than one question must be answered to arrive at a verdict on the same cause of action, the same five sixths of the jurors must agree on all such questions.” Sec. 270.25 (1), Stats.
When a comparison of negligence is called for,
“. . . it is necessary for at least the same 10 jurors to agree on every question that it is necessary for them to consider in answering the question of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hansberry v. DunnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
- Schmidt v. LearyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
- Evjen v. Packer City Transit Line, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- Taylor v. Western Casualty & Surety Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
- Edwards v. GrossWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Gorski v. GorskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- Edlebeck v. HootenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Hoeft v. FriedelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- Select Creations, Inc. v. Paliafito America, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1993
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.