Legal Opinion

Klanseck v. Anderson Sales & Service, Inc.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided July 9, 1984No. Docket 64816PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtC. W. Simon, J.

Following a trial in the Oakland County Circuit Court, the jury determined that both defendants were liable on negligence and breach of implied warranty theories. Damages were assessed at $40,000, and plaintiff Stephen Klanseck* 1 was found to be 60% negligent, resulting in a reduction of his recovery to $16,000. Plaintiffs now appeal as of right.

On May 27, 1976, plaintiff purchased a Honda G. L. 1000 motorcycle from Anderson Sales & Service. At the time of this purchase, plaintiff had only three hours experience with a motorcycle of this size and some ten hours of experience on a dirt bike…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Placek v. City of Sterling HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  2. In Re Certified QuestionsMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Zeni v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Karl v. Bryant Air Conditioning Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Clark v. STRAINOregon Supreme Court · 1958

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Gourley Ex Rel. Gourley v. Nebraska Methodist Health System, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Klanseck v. Anderson Sales & Service, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Young v. J.B. Hunt Transportation, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1989
  4. O'Connell v. Chesapeake & Ohio RailroadOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Heritage Resources, Inc. v. Caterpillar Financial Services Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2009

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API