Legal Opinion

Kuchenbecker v. Millhiser

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1959PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBroadfoot, J.

The sole question to be determined on this appeal is whether there is any credible evidence to support the finding of the jury that the plaintiff assumed the risk of the causal negligence of the defendant with respect to lookout.

It is a fundamental rule that if there is any credible evidence to support a finding of a jury the evidence in support thereof must be treated as undisputed, or if there is any credible evidence which, under any reasonable view, fairly admits of an inference that supports a finding of a jury, then neither the trial court nor the appellate court has authority to change…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Young v. Nunn, Bush & Weldon Shoe Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Bronk v. MijalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Tomchek v. Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Peterson v. MagnusWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hupf v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API