Lehman v. Sentry Insurance
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, C. J.
The sole issue on this appeal is whether there is any credible evidence in the record to sustain the jury’s finding that Augun and Yedinak were causally negligent in the manner in which the unloading operations were carried on.
If there is any credible evidence which, under any reasonable view fairly admits of an inference that supports the jury’s finding, neither the trial court nor an appellate court has any authority to change the jury’s answer or findings.
Resolving the issue presented necessitates a review of the evidence.
After the salvage material on Lehman’s truck had been weighed at…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kanzenbach v. S. C. Johnson & Son, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
- Burlison v. JanssenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Auster v. ZaspelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
- Hupf v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
- Stewart v. OlsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Millonig v. BakkenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
- Curtis J. Robison v. Charles Lescrenier and Gammex, Inc., a Wisconsin Corporation, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Hamed v. County of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
- State Ex Rel. Brajdic v. SeberWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
- Priske v. General Motors Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.