F. W. Means & Co. v. Carstens
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
STATON, Judge.
F. W. Means & Company (Means) instituted an action against its former employee, Thomas J. Carstens, and Carstens’ new employer, Coverall Rental Service, Inc. (Coverall), based upon issues involving breach of a restrictive employment contract, inducement of that breach, and the misuse of Means’ business confidential information. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendants and Means raises the following issues for our review:1(1) Whether the responses to requests for admission established Means had suffered no actual damages;(2) Whether Means was entitled…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited36 opinions
- State v. RankinIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
- Bassett v. GlockIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
- Richards v. Goerg Boat & Motors, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- Stuteville v. DowningIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- Premier Industrial Corporation v. Texas Industrial Fastener Company, Ed Roos, Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Boczar v. Meridian Street FoundationIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- Board of Aviation Commissioners v. HestorIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
- Palacios v. KlineIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- Peoples Trust & Savings Bank v. HumphreyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- Law v. Yukon Delta, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1984
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.