Legal Opinion
Bradley v. City of New Castle
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided June 26, 2000No. 33A01-9807-CV-281PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RILEY, Judge
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Appellants-Plaintiffs, James E. Bradley, Kay C. Miller and 354 Other Persons Owning Property in the Proposed Annexed Territory (hereinafter “Remonstrators”), appeal the trial court’s Order granting partial summary judgment in favor of the Appellee-Defendant, City of New Castle, Indiana (hereinafter “City” or “City of New Castle”). Remonstrators further appeal the trial court’s decision allowing the City to amend its Fiscal Plan during trial.
We reverse and remand with instructions.
ISSUES
Remonstrators raise two issues on appeal, which we restate as…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Chidester v. City of HobartIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
- Evans v. BrowneIndiana Supreme Court · 1869
- Sarlls, City Clerk v. State, Ex Rel.Indiana Supreme Court · 1929
- City of Terre Haute v. Evansville & Terre Haute RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
- State v. MonfortIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bradley v. City of New CastleIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
- Keene v. Elkhart County Park & Recreation BoardIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Nite Moves Entertainment, Inc. v. City of BoiseDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2001
- City of Carmel v. SteeleIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- City of Fort Wayne v. Certain Southwest Annexation Area LandownersIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001