Legal Opinion

Vega v. Farmers Insurance

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 17, 1995No. 93C-12442; CA A84679PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLeeson, J.

On cross-motions for summary judgment, plaintiffs were granted a declaratory judgment that they are entitled to uninsured/underinsured motorist (UM/UIM) coverage under a policy purchased from defendant, Farmers Insurance Company of Oregon. Defendant appeals, assigning error to the trial court’s denial of its motion and the granting of plaintiffs’ motion. There are no genuine issues of material fact. We review to determine which party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, Stevens v. Bispham, 316 Or 221, 223, 851 P2d 556 (1993); Cochran v. Connell, 53 Or App 933, 940, 632 P2d 1385, rev…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Stevens v. BisphamOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Allstate Insurance Company v. SpinelliSupreme Court of Delaware · 1982
  3. Cochran v. ConnellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  4. Turlay v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Kantor v. Boise Cascade Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Vega v. Farmers InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Berkshire Mutual Insurance v. BurbankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
  3. Waxman v. Waxman & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  4. Grayson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNevada Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Nationwide Mut. Insurance v. ShillingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API