Legal Opinion

Grayson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1999No. 29832PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Rose, J.:

Appellant Louise P. Grayson (Grayson) sought to recover underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage benefits from her insurance carrier, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance (State Farm). The district court found that the statute of limitations barred Grayson’s cause of action because she filed her claim more than six years after her accident. Thus, the district court entered summary judgment in favor of State Farm.

On appeal, Grayson contends that the district court erred in finding that the six-year limitations period began to run on the date of the accident. We…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Uptegraft v. Home Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  2. National Union Fire Insurance v. Reno's Executive Air, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Allstate Insurance Company v. SpinelliSupreme Court of Delaware · 1982
  4. Safeco Insurance Co. v. BarcomWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Lane v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hamm v. Allied Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2000
  2. Snyder v. CaseNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  3. American States Insurance Company v. Joann LaFlamSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2013
  4. Shelter Mutual Insurance v. NashSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  5. Wille v. Geico Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API