Legal Opinion

Smith v. Williams

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 25, 1920No. 10467PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Error flom District Court. Pittsburg County; R. W. Higgins, Judge. Action by J. M. Smith against John Williams and others, heirs of Joshua McCurtain, deceased, Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

This action involves the validity of a deed to restricted Choctaw lands. J. M. Smith brought the action against the heirs of Joshua McCurtain, a half-blood Choctaw, to reform a deed made to Smith by Joshua McCurtain, which deed was sought to be reformed on the ground of mutual mistake in description of the land. McCurtain’s allotment comprised the east % and lot 2 of the N. W. % of section 30, Twp. 4 N„ R. 16 east. He attempted to convey to Smith 40 acres of this allotment, the said 40 acres being the N. E. % of the N. W. % of said section; but, instead of describing said 40 acres, the deed…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Donnelly v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Heckman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Tiger v. Western Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. United States v. BabcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  5. McDowell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Tidal Oil Company v. FlanaganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  2. Armstrong v. LettySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  3. Sperry Oil & Gas Co. v. ChisholmSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. Molone v. WamsleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  5. McClure v. WadeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1950

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API