Legal Opinion

Sperry Oil & Gas Co. v. Chisholm

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 14, 1924No. 164PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sanford

The appellees, Webster Chisholm, a half-blood Cherokee Indian, and his wife, brought this suit in a state court of Oklahoma to cancel a supplemental instrument modifying and extending an oil and gas lease previously executed by him upon his “ homestead ” and “ surplus ” allotments of tribal lands. It was removed to the Federal District Court. That court, upon final hearing, entered a decree adjudging this instrument to be entirely null and void, and enjoining interference with the plaintiffs’ possession of the premises. This decree was affirmed by the Circuit Court of Appeals. 282 Fed. 93. An…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Heckman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Tiger v. Western Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Coyle v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. Rich v. DonegheySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  5. United States v. HollidaySupreme Court of the United States · 1866

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Board of Comm'rs of Jackson Cty. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Sunderland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Rector v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
  4. Hanson v. HoffmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
  5. Holmes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API