Stogsdill v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtKistler, J.
ORS 144.125C3) 1 provides that the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (board) may postpone a prisoner’s scheduled release date if the board finds that the prisoner has a “present severe emotional disturbance such as to constitute a danger to the health or safety of the community.” In this case, the board found by a preponderance of the evidence that petitioner had such a condition, and petitioner sought judicial review arguing that the Due Process Clause required the board to apply a higher standard of proof. The Court of Appeals affirmed the board’s order without opinion. Stogsdill…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Robin v. Teacher Standards & Practices Comm'nCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
- Hostetter v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- Porter v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- Rivas v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- Maney v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.