Legal Opinion

Stogsdill v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 2007No. CA A119694; SC S53458PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKistler, J.

ORS 144.125C3) 1 provides that the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (board) may postpone a prisoner’s scheduled release date if the board finds that the prisoner has a “present severe emotional disturbance such as to constitute a danger to the health or safety of the community.” In this case, the board found by a preponderance of the evidence that petitioner had such a condition, and petitioner sought judicial review arguing that the Due Process Clause required the board to apply a higher standard of proof. The Court of Appeals affirmed the board’s order without opinion. Stogsdill…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Robin v. Teacher Standards & Practices Comm'nCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  2. Hostetter v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  3. Porter v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  4. Rivas v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  5. Maney v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API