People v. Lamattina
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Merced County, and from an order denying a new trial. E. N. Rector, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
The defendant was charged by information filed in the superior court of Merced County by the district attorney of said county with the crime of an assault with a deadly weapon with intent to commit murder. He was convicted of the cripne of assault with a deadly weapon, and prosecutes this appeal from the judgment and the order denying him a new trial.
The sole point upon which the defendant relies for a reversal is that judgment of sentence was not pronounced within the time prescribed by the statute, and that, therefore, by the terms of the statute, it was the imperative duty of the trial…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- City of Pasadena v. StimsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Deyoe v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Darcy v. Mayor of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Rode v. SiebeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Rankin v. Superior Court of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1910
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. BeattyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- People v. BarrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- People v. RosenbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- People v. NovelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953