Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Beatty

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 1, 1933No. Docket No. 2340PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENDERSON, J., pro tem.

The appellant was charged by an information with the offense of violation of chapter 339 of the Laws of 1923 (the Firearms Act), more specifically, the possession of a firearm capable of being concealed upon the person, he having been convicted previously of a felony. Having waived a trial by jury, he was found guilty and appeals from the judgment and the order denying his motion for a new trial. At the commencement of the trial it was stipulated that the case be tried upon the preliminary transcript, which was read into the record.

Pursuant to section 969b of the Penal…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Casey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. People v. OsakiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  3. People v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. People v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
  5. People v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. DewsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  2. People v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  3. People v. CoyleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. People v. GilesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  5. People v. HoustonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API